Deal Deadlock

bnwbaron profile photo

Hi all, can you take a look and see if you can come up a solution to this? Thanks, Brian



The property, house #1:



91k 1st

2500 minor repairs

Mortgage is current

ARV 105k-125k. (Depending on which realtor you talk to) 3 year old appraisal at 113k



The seller:



Needs 5k cash for creditors

Has a house in mind for me to purchase, he buys it from me later

This house is in good condition and worth the price





The Deal:



I give 5k to the seller, he deeds the property over to me

I buy the house #2 on his behalf and he pays me to live there

He can pay 1500/mo. The PITI is approx 1200.

When his credit is repaired he buys and we divide equity



The sticking point:



He wants to be on title to the property.



It’s on my credit, I don’t want him on title…..I want to do a traditional L/O.



Is there a way to do this so we both win?

Comments(2)

  • bargain7615th March, 2007

    I would try to convince him that the mortgage payments for him would be much higher if he is on title, because of his credit score.

    After all, if he is on title, he needs to be on the mortgage. No legal way around it without your total agreement.
    [addsig]

  • mcole15th March, 2007

    With all due respect, why are you wanting to even do this deal?

    When you add in the repair costs, the house you would be buying from him would barely be 10%-12% under market value. Not to mention all of your other costs. There’s no way he could come close to getting that much if he sold conventionally.

    You say he needs $5,000 for creditors. But you also say he can afford $1,500 a month. What assurance do you have can afford anywhere close that?

    Also, why should he get a split of anything? He has absolutely zero into the deal and zero exposure… and he wants to be on title? He’s got to be kidding.

    Maybe I’m missing something here, but the whole thing seems a bit crazy to me.

    Just my 2¢

Add Comment

Login To Comment