Don't Overlook Real Estate in Retirement Investment Planning

Penscotrust profile photo

Are your clients interested in purchasing real estate for investment purposes, but don’t have enough cash on hand to do so? Maybe they do! There is a long-standing Internal Revenue Code regulation (see IRS publication 590 for complete regulations) that allows all Americans to invest their IRA funds, or 401(k) funds rolled into an Self-Directed IRA, in a wide variety of non-traditional investment types. Under the umbrella of a Self-Directed IRA, retirement account funds can be invested in such non-traditional assets as private mortgages, raw land, commercial buildings, vacation rentals, and multifamily homes, just to name a few. Keep in mind that your clients do not have to “cash out” their IRA to do this type of investing – these investments are made within a Self-Directed IRA. Your customer can simply transfer funds from existing IRAs or a 401(k) account that is from a previous employer, into a Self-Directed IRA to do this type of investing and it is penalty-free. Additionally, the taxes due on the growth of the investments are deferred until distribution begins at retirement. If the Self-Directed IRA is in the form of a ROTH IRA, both the principal and earnings are tax-free when distributed at retirement.



Let’s consider a real life example of how investing in Real Estate within a Self-Directed IRA can be a lucrative retirement strategy. Steve is interested in purchasing an office building with his IRA funds. He has found a building in a growing executive park, which is 100% occupied. The asking price is $400,000 but he only has $200,000 in his IRA. The current owner of the office building is willing to do seller carry-back for the balance of the loan. Therefore, Steve’s IRA has directly funded 50% of the purchase price and has financed the remaining 50% with the seller carry-back mortgage of $200,000.



Rental income from the office building now flows directly back to Steve’s IRA as a return on investment. His IRA uses a portion of that income to pay off expenses related to the running and maintenance of the building, such as the monthly mortgage payment to the seller, insurance coverage, property taxes, snow plowing and so forth. At the end of the year, the building owned by Steve’s IRA will have a net income of $20,000, after all expenses are paid.



However, since Steve’s IRA used financing to make the purchase, the portion of the income that is attributable to the financing is subject to Unrelated Debt-Financed Income, or UDFI. In Steve’s case, since his IRA financed 50% of the purchase price, then 50% of his net income, or $10,000, would be subject to UDFI tax. Since UDFI is taxed at ordinary trust tax rates, often as high as 40%, he will end up paying approximately $4,000 in UDFI taxes. However, his IRA will still end up with a net gain of $16,000 for the year (ROI of 8%). Even though his total IRA income was impacted by the UDFI tax, his net gain is still much more than the IRS limitation of annual contribution of $3000, or even the return on most publicly traded investments.



Twelve months after the debt is paid off, UDFI ceases to apply to the net income generated. Steve’s IRA will then continue to earn rental income and years down the road, when he is ready to retire, his IRA can sell the office building realizing the appreciated profit and all capital gains from the sale flow back to his IRA as a return on investment. When he retires, his IRA distributions are taxed at his lower, retired tax bracket. If he makes this investment with a Self-Directed Roth IRA, all of the return on investment is tax free upon distribution.



You may be wondering “what’s the catch?” While there is some paperwork involved, it is not much more than would be required if your customers were to purchase property without their IRA. There are also specific ways investments must be structured if your customers are using both their IRA and their own personal taxable funds to make a purchase. And, of course, they will need a reputable qualified special asset custodian who is willing to hold alternative assets such as Real Estate within a Self-Directed IRA in order to make it all possible. It’s always a good idea for your customers to contact their own financial or legal advisor to learn more about how they can take advantage of this little-known retirement strategy and start putting it to work today. Investing in the potentially lucrative area of Real Estate with a Self-Directed IRA is a lot easier than your clients may think! It also can potentially be the catalysis in closing substantially more sales in 2004 for you.

Comments(9)

  • joel14th April, 2004

    So really the only way for you to actually do a Self-Directed IRA real estate transaction is if the IRA purchases ALL of the property or if the owner can take back a mortage for the difference??



    What about if you have $10k in an IRA, how could you do a deal with this??

    • penscotrust14th April, 2004 Reply

      Hello Joel-



      You can purchase the property outright with IRA funds, the owner can carry back the mortgage, or you can use financing via a Non-Recourse Loan to the IRA. PENSCO does require 50% down from the IRA. With $10,000, you could consider forming an IRA-owned LLC, and the property would then be purchased by the LLC.

    • glieberman22nd April, 2004 Reply

      I have been researching this very point...I, too, am interested in leveraging the properties held by my self-directed IRA.



      There are some lenders out there who would be willing to finance these purchases...at least, I have been hearing of some, but still need their names. They are VERY few and far between tho.....keep looking (and if you find some, let me know, too!! grin )



      Not too many IRA custodians can handle IRA with real estate in them. In the last year, I've found only about 3 or 4 that can properly handle the custodial responsibilities for r/e held by IRAs.


  • arytkatz14th April, 2004

    Good article, but it seems a little light on important points regarding IRA's and RE investing. I just had a presentation by a local RE-focused CPA regarding IRA real estate investing. Some disadvantages not mentioned in this article:

    - Requires a use of a "qualified" third party IRA custodian. Think about this: this is your retirement money you're talking about--do you want an unknown company to handle this?

    - The IRA custodian holds title to the property in their name and their ID#, not you.

    - Must follow very specific IRS guidelines (which PENSCO may be able to help with)

    - If done incorrectly, the IRS can disallow the entire transaction, and will treat the entire IRA (not just the RE transaction) as a distribution, which, if before retirement age, would mean you pay tax on the entire amount, plus a 10% early withdrawal penalty.

    - You must hire a 3rd party property manager--you're not allowed to manage it yourself.

    - Any IRA purchased property cannot be used for personal use. If it's to be a future retirement home for you, you must rent it out between the time of the transaction and your retirement age. If this is awhile out, think about how your other rental property looks and imagine if you'd want to live there after them...

    - Financing is tricky: the seller carry back seems to be one way. You cannot loan money to your IRA, you cannot guarantee loans to your IRA and banks are generally not willing to loan money to an IRA.

    - As mentioned, your IRA pays expenses for the maintenance of the property: you cannot add money to the IRA for these if cashflow dips below expenses and they must be well documented and paid by the IRA custodian.

    - IRS requires a certified annual fair market appraisal every year

    - There are required minimum distributions at 70-1/2

    Not saying that IRA investing is a bad thing, but it definitely requires more investigation than this article leads you to believe.

    To me, it sort of flies in the face of what makes RE investing so good: no leverage, no year-to-year potential loss deductions and, depending on the IRA, capital gains on sale.

    Andy

    • Penscotrust15th April, 2004 Reply

      Just to clarify, the title to the property is held by the custodian not in it's name, but in the name of your IRA. For example: PENSCO Trust Custodian FBO (for the benefit of) IRA.



      An IRA owner can add money to their IRA, up to their annual contribution limit, if needed to cover IRA-owned property expenses. Ideally, rental income generated by the property would cover these expenses.



      As with any investment, IRA owners are advised to perform full due diligence research on any IRA custodian you are considering using for non-traditional investing. Check their track record, are they regulated? Have the ever been sanctioned by any regulatory body? There are a number of highly qualified special asset custodians who have been specializing in this area of alternative IRA investing for years.

    • NewDirectionBill20th April, 2004 Reply

      Andy, A couple of additional comments on yours and the presentation you attended.



      All IRA custodians must be either a bank, insurance company or IRS approved custodian. You will find that careful research will provide you many "previously unknown" but excellent companies to help you, including Entrust New Direction IRA.



      You may perform many of the duties of a manager, including directing improvements, approving renters and leases. Selection and negotiation with contractors.



      There is no IRS requirement for a "certified" appraisal every year. Fair value is required.



      The name of the retirement game is to have the most in the plan when you retire. Analysis of the track record of real estate investment over the past 30 years shows why real estate is a prime investment of choice for pension plans and retirement funds across the country.



      Obviously, it is more complex than asking your broker to buy 100 shares of IBM, but many people find the control they have over the real estate investment provides a much better return.



      Thanks for your comments.



      Bill

  • drspencer21st April, 2004

    Maybe I'm missing something here...in fact, it's very likely that I am...but wouldn't it make more sense to hold the property in an LLC and simply hold shares in the LLC in your IRA. The LLC could then be structured so that you maintain control of the LLC either personally or through a separate company. Could someone please point out the advantages or disadvantages of this approach?



    Thanks.

    • glieberman22nd April, 2004 Reply

      I have not typically seen LLC's that have "shares"...most of them are structured as, and are treated as, partnerships. I believe that is true even for those structured as "S" corp.'s. The earnings from the LLC are passed through to the personal income of the partners.



      The biggest plus to putting each different property into its own LLC is the "limited liability" that the LLC affords. In or out of a deferred portfolio, if someone slips on your property and sues you (or the IRA), then the loss can be limited to only the value of that property, and the entire portfolio is not at risk.


  • Jaylong712th May, 2004

    Correction: UBIT unrelated business income tax is the proper term. I hope your not in the Custodian business with out the basic IRA education.

Add Comment

Login To Comment